![]() Hence, many operators are seeking alternatives to Wi-Fi for mission-critical applications.Įveryone loves their smartphones and the ease of use they bring. Integrators can work to minimize the hand-off time, but regular connectivity losses are impossible to eliminate in large Wi-Fi networks. When this occurs, there is a loss of critical data. Ultimately, when the client moves beyond the range of the AP, it has to break its connection before handing off to the next AP. If you have mobile clients, you can expect the best data rate you will ever get is a fraction of the advertised speeds. Wi-Fi networks suffer from a little-known performance issue where an AP self-retards itself, and only transmits as fast as its weakest client connection. ![]() In other words, the signal degrades rapidly as mobile clients move farther from access points.ĭon’t assume degraded performance is only associated with the client that has moved away from the Access Point (AP). Fundamentally, Wi-Fi limits client connections to a single connection to a specific access point. Still, this LAN technology is best suited for non-mission-critical communications due to underlying protocol shortcomings. Wi-Fi brings the benefits of high speed and capacity to support an increasing concentration of mobile devices. However, these networks on their own fall short of providing effective non-stop connectivity. When business leaders think of network connectivity for industrial enterprises today, they tend to think of Wi-Fi and LTE or 5G connectivity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |